It’s finally the month of March, and the college basketball madness that ensues is right around the corner.
Conference tournaments begin next week, marking the official beginning to March Madness. Linsanity will give way to Bracketology and the yearly argument over Virginia Tech’s bubble bursting. Daftar Situs Judi Bola Resmi
Following Selection Sunday, work productivity hits its annual low point, as offices everywhere become obsessed with identifying this year’s 12/5 upset, even though the secretary who picks her favorite mascots is destined for bracket greatness.
As public exposure increases, we see more money backing the top teams and heavy favorites, meaning there are good opportunities forcontrarian bettors to find value.
With their #1 ranking and Player of the Year candidate Anthony Davis dominating highlight reels, the public continues to pound Kentucky, who sports an impressive 28-1 record with wins over Kansas, North Carolina and Louisville.
In the 27 games for which we received College Basketball Betting Trends Data, the Wildcats have received more public action than their opponent 23 times.
Note: Sports Insights did not receive public betting data for the games against Radford and Arkansas-Little Rock, so these contests were not included in our research.
Not surprisingly, three of the games in which Kentucky received fewer than 50% of spread bets came against North Carolina, Florida and Louisville, other ranked-teams and perennial favorites of public bettors as well.
Looks at the sports betting world as a unique marketplace. Unlike the stock market, the sports betting marketplace produces clear winners or losers based on measurable outcomes (sporting events). By applying some of the same economic tools and theories used in the financial world, we evaluate the sports betting marketplace for inefficiencies. By “inefficiencies” we simply mean measurable and predictable mispricing of games. Our research has uncovered profitable betting systems and strategies that exploit these measurable inefficiencies in the sports world. The most published and easily implemented of these betting systems is our signature “Bet Against the Public” or “Fade the Public” strategy. Stop buying snake oil from “scamdicappers” and start sports investing with a proven betting strategy. Take a moment to review our sports betting research and articles.
Despite being a favorite of the public, Kentucky has struggled against the spread (ATS). Bettors simply fading the Wildcats have won at a rate of 59.4% ATS.
When adding betting percentage and point spread filters, that winning percentage becomes even greater.
Our analysis of Betting Against the Public in College Basketball shows that contrarian betting has historically been profitable when playing on double-digit underdogs that are receiving 40% or fewer of spread bets.
Bettors applying these criteria to Kentucky’s 27 games this season increased their win rate to 64%.
We also found that Kentucky has been greater than a 19-point favorite, while receiving more than 60% of spread bets, nine times. They failed to cover the spread in seven of those games.
The table below summarizes the win rates when betting against Kentucky at three betting percentage and point spread levels.